State-of-the-Art Processes

Although IRS Rev. Proc. 2000-37 provides the necessary guidance on the structure of safe harbor reverse exchanges, there is nothing formal that describes the various and detailed aspects of the execution of reverse exchanges. Ultimately, there is no authority on correct reverse exchange execution. Potential Exchangers will be surprised by the resulting lack of consistency in reverse exchange execution.  Many Accommodators use outdated reverse exchange documents that do not reflect current best practices, IRS guidance and the results of various forms of litigation and court action. Many accommodators, especially those charging fees on the low end of the range, cut every possible corner to avoid cost and reduce the time expended. This will likely come back to haunt the Exchanger as many elements of the process can affect the Exchanger after the conclusion of the exchange. Other Accommodators charge very high fees because they really do not want to perform reverses but will do them, at unreasonable expense to the Exchanger, if enough “arm twisting” is applied. This results in spending money needlessly for services provided by a reluctant Accommodator. Frequently, this results in the Accommodator looking at the Exchanger as an adversary and the Accommodator will force the Exchanger to spend an inordinate amount of time collecting information that serves only to reduce their risk of being sued by the Exchangor.

We have invested heavily in reverse exchange processes that are carefully structured to bring value to clients. We ensure complete and timely exchange execution while masking unnecessary complexity. We believe, based on the criteria listed below, that our processes are superior to any others.

The criteria that constitute this standard are as follows: